Skip navigation

I was doing my pre show research form DEMA 09 this morning. I have ordered a few things already that I will be picking up during the show. While doing this I found this diving simulation software and I decided to write some of my impressions on it to update my post on the world 2.0 and rebreather training. I registered and downloaded the e-diving software.

Although my computer complies with all the system requirements I have just recovered from an unexpected reboot and have sent Microsoft my error report. What else can I say from the customer point of view?

I was careless enough to download a sixty something mb .exe file from a site I never visited before. Then I experience a reboot and a critical error screen on my PC after the software was performing poorly; the poor performance was because it was “the first time” I used it according to eDiving.

Should I run that software again to find out what went wrong? I guess I will give it a try.

I’m back with my PC on and working. Same happened. I’m removing the program from my computer just about now. Never even had the chance to “dive it”; furthermore, my equipment configuration, first thing I went on in the program, does not include any brand of rebreather although I found the link to eDiving trough the search feature in the DEMA exhibitor listing with the keyword: rebreather.

I guess I will continue doing my research for the show…

I have been reading quite a few articles about the internet business and the dive store traditional model. It seems that the most “affected” field of the diving industry is the equipment sales business model.

While some manufacturers are resisting the internet as a sales channel, some others are taking great advantage of it. This is affecting directly the way in which dive centers manage their equipment sales and deteriorating their relationship with their once “best friends”: manufacturers.

At the same time, training agencies are creating products that develop mainly on line and in which the only part that is left to the instructor is the in water training. Even before that, many entrepreneurs started creating diving simulation software. I don’t particularly like the software created but the trend is catching up with technology and some money will definitely make a difference in those.

There is one quite obvious fact: The information technologies have changed our world forever. The power is now in the hands of the user; whether it is about shopping for scuba equipment on line or getting trained in a scuba course the tendency is to go on a technology platform, name it Internet if you want. We must expect that in the midterm all the “in water experience” will go virtual and will be provided by a very fancy multimedia platform.

One conclusion could be drawn: The diving industry has always been behind the opportunities that the internet creates and traditional business models have retarded the development of those opportunities for the diving industry turning them into threats.

I think the scuba industry needs to get ahead of the technology trend for once. We must create the inevitable before it reshapes our business for ever, just like the internet did. With this I mean a pro active approach.

PADI has very interesting material on the Undersea Journal. They are always following the market trends and the generational approach of customers. Another conclusion may be drawn from what we read in the UJ: The customers are changing. Children are digital beings now and this is something a lot of old time instructors will never understand nor share. Not to blame them; it’s just the world is spinning to fast these days.

I have three brothers and one sister. The two younger ones are having experiences I just had the chance to dream about when I was younger: One is a Rock and Roll star in Guitar Hero, he plays on the internet with other people trough his Wii console. He is now taking electric guitar lessons and he is doing just fine. My other brother used to fly planes with Microsoft’s flight simulator and has now evolved into scale planes that really fly. Both of them share all they do about their hobbies in social networks and have constant participation in blogs, peer to peer networks, etc.

Where I want to get with this family jewels explanation is that the new generations want to have the experiences we could only dream of when it was our time… and they want it now. The scary thing is that they are getting them trough many different tools and platforms and that the diving industry is falling behind.

I have just completed some of the basic technical instructor ratings. I still have a long way to go. I would love to dive the Andrea Doria and get one of the valuable china plates; but, at this moment I’m just not capable of doing it in a safe way. On the other hand, a twelve year old can be Sebastian Loeb in the world rally championship on Play Station.

Remember what it was like when only military divers could use a CCR or even become an Open Circuit Diver? What was it like before “Diving is fun”? My point here is that the diving industry will get to be just like that in the midterm if we don’t get out with new innovative and technology based platforms.

I can only dream of a video game in which people can actually learn CCR diving and all the theory it involves with a different approach than going through a really long “diving in general” chapter with raid.com, having a less than friendly power point presentation with IANTD or reading a black & white TDI book. It will definitely be more fun than reading the 100+ pages on the APD manual on a basic air diluent course even if I don’t own one.

A lot of things can happen underwater and a video game is a very good way to simulate that, thus I could go and have a grasp of what being inside the Andrea Doria feels like, get “eyes on” experience on a HUD and computer display. I’d like to see that in a really big high definition screen, manage it with my Wii joystick and have to do a couple s-drills while underwater by pressing buttons at 50+ m.

If I do survive the dive on my console, I would like everyone on line to know about my achievement and feel like John Chatterton for once. Be cheered on social networks!! When I think about that I realize we will need a mash up in Google to place an avatar flag on the wreck and a virtual log book to brag around.

One day we scuba instructors will have to compete with the “having great experiences on line trend” and that will be the end of the link between the 3 E’s offered by dive shops. That will be the end of the dive shop business model. Education, Equipment sales and experiences will compete on line instead of collaborate in one place. Furthermore, diving will have much more competition for experiences just as great that cost a fraction of the money we need to spend on a CCR course and unit nowadays.

If you don’t believe me, think of the travel industry. From the late 70’s to the early 90’s the traditional travel agent business model was developed in the United States. Airlines, Car rentals, reservation systems, tour operators were involved in a very well structured chain. If an airline sold a seat, many of the other players would get a cut. That business model is now over and all the one time “partners” are now equally competing for the “internet traveler” attention.

Does this means that diving will disappear? I hope not but this definitely means that the industry has to get hands on to create a way of training virtual divers, making it more fun and increasing volume.

With some money invested in IT and by making it really fun and rewarding, hopefully we will increase the amount of people having the diving experience on line and therefore convert some of them into “enthusiastic divers” that actually want to go underwater with a reputable dive operator that do require a C card and forms filled assuming potential death and injury.

If the Silicon Valley people could do this with golf (a much more boring sport than diving for me) they can definitely do it with underwater exploration of caves in the Mexico, wrecks in Northern Europe, Sharks in the Galapagos Islands and so on.

On September 23, 2009 a post was created in the DSAT Tec Rec Blog. In this post, the PADI / DSAT Crew started a very interesting discussion. Should supervisory staff be allowed to wear CCRs when conducting PADI courses?

Many responses have been recorded. As for now, 57% of all responses say: Yes, on some courses. 38% of the responses say: No, not on any courses and 5% say yes, on any course. I did reply to the poll and mine was yes, on some courses. I also commented that my instructor did use one in the last few dives of my tec trimix course. My approach is that, other than expensive trimix in a course, I if we use a CCR with students the reason would be to teach a CCR course.

Maybe a Discover CCR course would be a cool thing to do for recreational divers thinking of going bubbleless, then a Basic CCR course with air diluent and a way of making it an optional rig for courses therefurther in the PADI system. A DSAT decompression course with CCR would be cool as well  and mixed gas courses with CCR would be in order.

As for other member of the CCR community, a very rich discussion has started on the matter. The fact that having an instructor in a CCR is reasonable for some courses and as a direct way to market CCR diving. We need to keep in mind that this involves direct participation from PADI in the CCR business.

I think the matter goes on to how deep PADI wants to go with CCR’s. As many of us agree, the value added for “allowing a CCR while supervising courses” can be questionable and there are probably as many opinions as divers in the world. In addition a lot of work will be needed to regulate that use of CCR’s and many contradictions will appear.

On the other hand, I think most of us will agree in the fact that what we need as PADI members is an innovative approach for CCR training in the recreational and technical fields and that we need it in the short term. This involves really hard work as well but PADI will have to restructure all the PADI ConEd system and teaching standards to suit the market’s needs in the future anyways…

http://tecrec.wordpress.com/2009/05/26/sad-news/trackback/

People like to define themselves.

In the underwater community, a good way to define people could be the “mainstream – core” living trend.

Why does an Open Water Divers choose to be an Open Water Scuba Instructor the moment he enters a classrooom? Because that diver is a core liver. What would a mainstream liver do? A good answer could be something like: Hesitate about the Advanced Open Water.

Does an OWD who likes diving has to become a CCR diver? Not really, but becoming a OWSI or a MSDT reflects a core living motivation and inspiration.

 

“I am a Diving Instructor and a Technical Diver because I want these personal tools to take me where the origins of life lay: And that is Deep under the Surface.

Jorge A.Mahauad

Legislating Stupidity is not the way
We are all stupid and incompetent
we are divers!

CCR’s have te ability to offer: Long, Silent and Warm Dives.

Rebreathers should be available for divers who want to reach for them.

Divers who want to use a CCR’s have a great deal of risk to manage. Isnt that what we do in the diving industry? Yes, trough training of students and instructors.

There is something called the Bee Law, and it is lovely:

According to earlier laws of Aviation, there was no way that a bee should be able to fly.
Its wings are way too small to get its fat little body off the ground.
The bees, of course, flew anyway.
Because bees didn’t care what humans thought was impossible

“According to earlier laws of Aviation, there was no way that a bee should be able to fly. Its wings are way too small to get its fat little body off the ground.

The bees, of course, flew anyway. Because bees didn’t care what humans thought was impossible”.

We have the same problem in the underwater community. Tec, Rec, CCR definition’s are useful for structure and analysis of techniques and procedures but we must remember that we are still in the early times of diving.

Technical diving is broadly defined by the underwater community. It’s definition changes with almost every real innovation in the industry because everything is changing, because diving evolves. That is why, according to  Dr. Drew Richardson, President DSAT TDD “The definition of tec diving is loose – it is sport diving that’s whatever recreational diving is not. Tec diving is about diving’s dreamers – the individuals who see what is possible when others can’t. Today’s tec diving may be tomorrow’s recreational diving.”

The “looseness” of the definition comes from the traditional approach to Diving. Diving  needs a new approach, a flexible approach. Flexibility is what nitrox, tec and ccr diving are about, going past the “human” SCUBA millestone  limits in order to refine Diving.

As divers, we love definitions but we dont need them to go underwater; we can go reckless without them anyway and some often do. The problem is that definitions can often hold the underwater community from getting wet.

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.